Singapore DC-CFA2 full-load efficiency delta
At nominal 8.0 MW IT: 10.0 MW facility meets 1.25; 10.4 MW exceeds itmodeled
| Value kind | modeled — Interpret this value according to its displayed kind, scope, source, and as-of date. |
|---|---|
| Scope | Exact nominal teaching operands, not readings: 8.0 MW IT at 100% duty; 10.0/10.4 MW facility states, 0.4 MW difference, and 8,760 full-duty hours for a non-leap-year sensitivity. Show PUE to two significant figures and the energy penalty to one; use exact nominal ratios for the threshold comparison. Chapter 5.8 bounds the plant-state comparison; no load forecast or tariff is assumed. |
| As of | 2026-09-08 |
| Source | Guide assumptions and arithmetic, September 8, 2026; statutory/allocation criteria remain in their separate primary-source claims. · Appendix G, G-SG01: authored teaching assumptions and derivation awaiting publication with this batch; the canonical route identifies the chapter, not evidence that this case is already live. |
| Derivation | Unrounded nominal comparisons: 10.0/8.0=1.25 ≤1.25; 10.4/8.0=1.30 >1.25. Both display about 1.3 to two significant figures. Crossover facility draw=8.0×1.25=10.0 MW. Annual sensitivity=0.4 MW×8,760 h=3,504 MWh=3.504 GWh, displayed about 4 GWh/year to the 0.4 MW input precision. The exact exercise energy-charge operand is 3,504,000 kWh times a constant marginal contract rate, not claimed billing accuracy; variable rates require hourly sums. Measurement uncertainty must establish a project’s actual margin. |
| Review | checking…cadence-derived review 2027-01-06 · standard cadence |
| Recorded changes | none recorded |
| Claim id | guide2-t214-g-singapore-load-delta |
Where the guide uses it
Not quoted in a chapter yet; it is kept in the curated register.
← Full numbers register — every date-stamped figure in the guide, with revision history.